![]() It is slower and wont work on some new site not because it is bad and old rather since Chromium optimised technologies. "Your browser your way (UNLESS you want use legacy firefox extensions, since I want artificially block them, want run it on anything expect teh latest and greatest windows since we artificially block older versions I mean they cannot run and roytam1 never did make it work on xp or anything or want make your custom build which case we will hunt you down like did to openbsd version and Mypal.) Feels like they do not want anyone use their browser. Well Tobin was hostile torwards openbsd devs too. ![]() Also Palemoon devs did not bother with EME since it is antifeatureĪnd I think gansangriff meant their decision artificially block XP and being hostile torward anyone even thinking it. It was like back in day peoples said Netscape and Opera did not support latest web standard that ie did while IE standards were broken to begin with. Many say Palemoon render engine is bad because it is slow and cannot play DRM videos. Mozilla turned bloat at one point and palemoon kept is optimised code instead of adding useless featues. Only thing I would consider "bloat" is sync feature but atleast it wont push it to my face all the time. It wont focus bloat, rather to do what web browser is designed to, view HTML documents. ![]() ![]() Palemoon goal was also remove many of antifeatures firefox had and that os why it runs better on many hardware. From the day one, its goal was to take advantage of modern CPUs and their newer instruction sets while Firefox was the one that catered to ancient CPUs. When Pale Moon project was started, it wasn't about catering to old hardware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |